Brainstorming and Developement
Brainstorming began after identifying key limitations in ARM 2.0, where joints were structurally integrated into the tube stock, making link length changes between shoulder and elbow impossible without redesigning the entire arm. Additional issues included backlash from REV gearboxes, and separate motors, controllers, and wiring, which increased complexity, weight, and failure points.
This led to research into integrated motor modules, commonly used in robotics to combine motor, reducer, encoder, and controller into a single unit. Design requirements were defined as modular, compact, lightweight, high torque, low backlash, and adaptable, enabling independent joints that could interface with variable-length tube links while reducing wiring and improving reliability. Harmonic drives were selected due to their high torque density and near-zero backlash, and modules were designed around Harmonic Drive 17-100-118879-11 reducers sourced second-hand. Each module integrates an ODrive controller with magnetic encoder feedback and is housed in a single-piece CNC aluminum structure.
As part of the Master Validation Plan, I designed and machined an initial module to retrofit ARM 2.0 using a NEO 1.1 motor, validating mechanical interfaces, tolerances, and manufacturability before committing to full deployment. Following successful validation, the ARM 3.0 motor modules were contract manufactured, establishing a fully modular joint architecture independent of the arm structure.
Hand - Onshape/Solidworks
Verification and Manufacturing
Manufacturing, testing, and verification followed an iterative prototype-to-production process. Initial housings were FDM printed with a Bambu Lab to validate fitment, assembly clearances, and general tolerances before committing to machining. Final parts were CAM programmed in Fusion 360 and CNC machined on a Tormach mill, using a 3-setup machining process to achieve full geometry and maintain alignment between harmonic drive interfaces and structural mounting features.
Structural verification was performed using FEA under worst-case loading conditions derived from the spreadsheet torque and shear model (see second sheet of verification PDF). Early analysis identified stress concentrations at internal corners, leading to increased fillet radii to reduce peak stresses and improve load distribution. The FEA results shown reflect the optimized geometry, confirming low stress, minimal deflection, and structural performance meeting the 2.5 factor of safety requirement.